Discussion about this post

User's avatar
#1 WSM Fan's avatar

I think what the article failed to address when encouraging people to change jobs frequently for higher pay is that job hoping only works when you are currently underpaid and you have the necessary skills and experience to justify that pay jump. Most people do the same thing everyday in their job without investing in themselves, hoping to get higher pay by changing job is really hoping the hirer is a greater fool or just day dreaming. Although it may work at the beginning, as salary gets higher, company expects value for their bucks and not pay for someone who only knows how to talk their way through. Being able to sell yourself is well and good but smoking your way into a position that's beyond your capabilities is pure fraud.

Expand full comment
Ice Fox's avatar

I migrated to Australia so I'm immersed in a different corporate environment. I'm surprised that this practice is so commonplace back home - as you point out, there are numerous disadvantages. It seems the only advantage is that it "directly" answers the question of, how much would it take to make a person leave their current stable job? No one leaves their current job for a less than 20% increment, and if 20% is tempting enough, why offer more?

I've hired about 10 people to work in my team / adjacent teams in the not so recent past and I have to say that not once was a person's prior salary ever a factor in the offer. There's one additional point I'd like to add to the list of disadvantages - if you hire everyone at a 20% increment to their last job, their absolute salaries aren't going to be similar, and this inequality has a corrosive and toxic effect on company morale and culture - I can't imagine something more demoralizing than two people doing the same job yet one being paid significantly less for no real reason!

Generally we approach things the same way a marketing professional would position their product in the marketplace. If the focus is on salary - fixating on the 20% increment number, or offering a higher salary just to attract the talent you want - then that's just like a product being marketed based on price, that's a battle you don't want to engage in, because even if you win, you lose. You feel like you won by hiring an employee for cheap, or snatching a top performer from another company, but then any competitor can steal your best employee by simply throwing 20% more at them.

We mainly sell the non-monetary aspects of the job - professional development of soft and hard skills, satisfaction / prestige of working on market leading products, enjoyable company culture, work life balance, work from home flexibility, well maintained and comfortable corporate offices. Salary isn't even a discussion point - everyone in a grade level gets similar pay. Perform well and you get fast tracked on a development plan to bring you to a higher grade with more responsibility and pay. If your employees are with you because of these aspects, they actually become really "sticky" because it's extremely hard to for them to compare these aspects with another company - the other company can promise them the same things, but they have no idea whether they're just making it up.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts